OM would have put pressure on Mr. Wattellier, the referee of the poster of the 12th^e day of L1 between Lens and Marseille, this same thing in Bollaert, for people on the debates and so

Obtain a valuable victory (1-3). This is the strong implication broadcast hotly at a press conference by Will Still, the Sang et Or coach.

Part of the evidence of the pole play phase in the match: the 85^e minute and the equalizing goal of Labeau-Lascary, finally refused to the locals via the VAR for a prior foul on the boy Nadir at the entrance to the artesian surface, with the victorious free kick signed Hojbjerg which followed (1- 3.89^e).

Was the VAR overzealous?

“ From the moment he (the referee, editor’s note) Is it three meters of action that we hear on manifest error? I’ll let you answer this question « , says Will Still, who does not fail to remind us that video assistance does not have to intervene if  » an obvious error » is not observed.

“ I’m told that there was an impossible cinema at half-time to put pressure on the referee, and as luck would have it, the refereeing completely changed in the second period,
add the strategy to Belgium. The choice has nothing to do with the clear ones, and it comes with a memory. » A reproach which had already been made to the Marseillais, in Lyon in particular where the sports advisor of President Longoria Medhi Benatia had distinguished himself by sharply criticizing Mr. Bastien’s refereeing.