Why is it explicitly discussed here when financing the transfer?
In other words, as if it were to be justified.
A Luis Diaz is transferred for the same transfer, no one wonders how it is funded.
Probably because Bavaria is a profit of around 60 million per year and could theoretically pay the transfer with the fixed deposit account, which is not done for liquidity, etc.
As far as I know, it was often supported with Bavaria that Adidas could help with the transfer of Wirtz. It is therefore sometimes written on how a transfer must be funded.
Each clearly thinking observer has thoughts similar to you here.
However, some people almost reflect the role of victim and feel very comfortable.
Then there are abstrus comments like @California
Thank you for the suggestion.
I think my comment was misunderstood.
Where do you read that I am looking for a victim role here or an index here?
I was surprised that the funding was so explicitly treated.
The Luis Diaz comparison was just one example because it accidentally contains the same transfer.
Will this be the case for each more important transfer in the future that you will discover how the transfer is funded in the article?
It would also be important to know which sources are based on the transfer market, because it would actually be exciting.
I just felt like the club had to justify itself.
The arguments you bring from the voices of Bayern, but in the (Site notre bureau spécialisé) trade, you have long been withdrawn from the fact that the funds of the Champions or the League League are sufficient alone.
As long as UEFA or FIFA decide, it must be assumed that clubs have finances under control accordingly.
Therefore, I find the reaction on your part more reflexive.
I had to smile at your first message what you are trying to submit now as an explanation, but is already weird.
Only so that you can see how far you go with the comparison of the tail:
UEFA 2024
FC Bayern € 60.5 million
Gala 29.3 million euros
UEFA 10 years
FCB 883.4 million euros
Gala approximately. 238 million euros
WM club
FCB € 50 million
Gala -14.99 € (DAZN subscription)
Stadium denomination duties (10 years from 2023)
FCB Allianz € 130 million
Gala Rams Global 46 million euros
Stade income per game at home
FCB 5.2 million euros
The gala cannot be determined due to the spectator’s fluctuations and prices.
The appreciated total annual turnover
FC Bayern AG 951.5 million euros
Galatasaray A.ş. Approx. € 172 million
To come back to your feeling: yes, the club must justify itself with such a contractual size. Especially since it is a listed company.
Because alone with sales of dubious properties that have taken place in the situation of the mafia cannot be justified such a transfer.
